Richard Saunders liked an update for Ageless

HAPPY BOOK BIRTHDAY TO AGELESS!

  

Today, with the help of Alicia Smock, I put an EXCLUSIVE short story "sidequel", called "Selfless" on Examiner.com. They decided to FEATURE it on their Arts & Entertainment page! Go read it.

REMINDER - I am taking over Inshares Twitter TONIGHT at 7pm EST/4pm PST.

Here’s how it works:

  • Get on Twitter.
  • Ask Me Anything you want using the hashtag #AgelessByPaulInman so I can find the question.
  • I’ll answer as many questions as I can in the hour time frame.
  • We all rejoice, and most likely have ice cream/cake or ice cream cake (if you’re fancy)

REVIEWS ARE IMPORTANT  (We have 16 as of right now) 

I am hoping to get more on Amazon’s Ageless pageso we can get more visibility on the site. You’ll need to give a starred and written review, please - short and sweet is fine (5 stars - I loved it.)

Then copy and paste your review onto GoodreadsAgeless page! It only takes a second and it could change my life.

LAUNCH PARTY SATURDAY!


DragonCon is a yearly event in Atlanta and this year for their 30th anniversary they’ve decided to create their own awards for SciFi and Fantasy called, what else, The Dragon Awards! If you enjoyed Ageless consider nominating me for an award. (Alternate History or Military SciFi would be the categories most like Ageless, yeah it’s hard to categorize).

Thanks for everything! I now must go and celebrate!!

like · liked by Kelsey and 6 others

People who have liked this reader update

    Richard Saunders commented on Blood Dawn
    John, I wish you well in whatever direction you take. You have been an important catalyst helping a lot of the authors and readers here and I, along with many others, fully appreciate that.

    Please allow me to be brutally honest with my opinion here. Forgive me if anyone finds it offensive.

    Your stated reasons for removing your book from Inkshares seem puzzling, incomplete and logically flawed. Although no one else has yet voiced this, I’ll bet that many have thought it. 

    "ultimately, it is about preserving my own creative energy so that I can get to the polished third draft I want to pass over to production. This has been a difficult and painful choice, however ultimately the crowdfunding model has placed too much strain on me mentally and emotionally and my priority, beyond the desire to build a readership for Blood Dawn, is to make sure Blood Dawn is as amazing as it can be."

    It would seem that the worst is already over - we all saw how fast our combined efforts got "A God In The Shed" over the 750 threshold and everyone believes the same would happen for your title with not much further effort required from you. Your network here would get that done!

    You spread yourself very thin here with an almost manic pace of activities and additional "projects" and promotions for others. So the mental and emotional strain you speak of likely stemmed from the entirety of this and can’t solely be blamed on the "crowdfunding model".

    Unless there is something major that you are not revealing, the prudent reaction to your stress would seem to be to scale back the "other activities" and put your time and energy into the book at this critical point in time.

    I fail to see how the "crowdfunding model" would play any role in stopping you from making this third draft the best possible ms you are capable of producing.

    Once you reach the 750 mark, there is NO deadline for submitting a ms into the production process. Indeed some authors here are taking a LOT of time after completing their funding. The Haida Gwaii Lesson and Guns in the Hands of Artists are two prominent examples.

    All you need do is take a breather to recover from the mental and emotional stress and then go back to work on the novel with your creative energy preserved, having lightened your load and scaled-back from the extraneous activities here and Goodreads and all of the other numerous platforms you use to engage with and help others.

    Of course my suggestions pre-suppose that what you stated is true. What I suspect is that you may be slightly disingenuous with your stated reasons for removing your book from this platform and that your real motivation is much more than the reasons given.  I apologize if that suspicion is unfounded - but it just seems to make more sense.

    Although Inkshares is a non-binding contractual model, I would personally feel a very strong obligation to my own supporters, to Inkshares management and staff to follow through on my promise to produce my title here after reaching the point that you have.

    I would feel that leaving now is a serious breach of trust and is tantamount to "breaking my word". Once I commit to something like this, all I need is a handshake promise to make my word my bond. That’s just the way I operate and the moral framework that shapes my life. I realize that most people nowadays do not share this strict adherence to such old-fashioned values.

    I hesitated to write this opinion piece and ultimately decided to place it here in a last ditch effort to ask you to reconsider your decision. You are a good guy and a valuable member of this community.

    Does anyone else here want to join in and urge John to keep Blood Dawn on Inkshares? It may be a futile effort at this point, but at least we or I tried. I wouldn’t do this John, if I didn’t believe you and Blood Dawn were worth the effort.

    God Bless and good luck with whatever direction your journey takes.
    like · liked by Michael

    People who have liked this comment for <i>A Thousand Roads</i>

      M.F. Moone followed Richard Saunders
      Richard Saunders
      and Mykl Walsh
      Follow
      Richard Saunders followed Alexander Barnes
      Alexander Barnes
      UI/UX Designer, Game Designer, Writer, Time Traveler
      Follow
      Richard Saunders followed The Amaranth Chronicles: Deviant Rising
      The Amaranth Chronicles: Deviant Rising
      "After a surveillance culture has taken control over the galaxy, it’s up to an eclectic group of misfits from disparate corners of the cosmos to rediscover the forbidden concepts of life, love and liberty."
      Jesse West followed Richard Saunders
      Richard Saunders
      and Mykl Walsh
      Follow
      Laura Marie followed Richard Saunders
      Richard Saunders
      and Mykl Walsh
      Follow
      Richard Saunders liked the forum thread, Co-Authorship on Inkshares
      Hello Inkshares Authors and Readers! 

      I have a question for Inkshares and the Inkshares community about co-authorship and how it’s represented/integrated into the Inkshares site. 

      First off I have been really loving the updates to the Inkshares online platform, including these forums! Thanks so much @Thad @Jeremy Thomas Inkshares is looking/feeling really great and the new additions have deeply enhanced the online experience! In that vein of improvement, I offer the following observation and question:

      So far, (and please correct me if I am wrong) I seems that only one Inkshares account can be the "author" of a book project, but as we know many books have two or more authors. While RUNE OF THE APPRENTICE only has one author (me!) I have co-written another book which am very excited to begin funding on Inkshares in the next month or so. (I will spare you the details because promoting that book is not the purpose of this post.)

      The briefest of backgrounds:

      This book is a memoir of another’s life and we therefore want him to be the "primary" face of the book project here on Inkshares, with me listed as co-author. To serve this end, we will be hosting the book under his name and Inkshares account, but also very much would like my account to be officially associated with the project here within the integrated Inkshares site. Currently, I have 553 followers on Inkshares and feel that it would best serve everyone involved to have all of my books (co-authored and otherwise) to be officially associated with my meta account.

      It seems that due to the current framework of the Inkshares site, this is not directly possible and we will have to have this new book hosted under my co-author’s account solely, with the only connection that I am a co-author shown in the "About" section, again, without any official connection felt through the interconnected Inkshares site. Is this correct, or am I mistaken? 

      Current workarounds:

      It seems that there are several ways other authors have dealt with this co-author disconnection:

      Some people have created a joint account like: 
      @Nick Scott and Noa Gavin , @Adam Greven and Matt Deller , @S.T. Ranscht and Robert P. Beus , @Jesse and Sylvia Medlong , @Abigail Burton and Autumn Gass , @Julian Green and Finn Mcrae , @David Michael Slater-author and Andy Catling-illustrator  etc.

      While others have their book listed under a solo author’s account like @Paul Inman and Patrick Ryerson (can’t link him because I can’t find his account), @Alexander Barnes and Christopher Preiman (Again, cant link because I can’t find account.) @Richard Saunders and Mykle Walsh. I’m sure there are others here I am missing--I know of at least two, but can’t remember their names. 

      And others who have a brand associated with their book like @HERB , @Papercuts J.P. and @Little Fiction | Big Truths 

      The plot thickens:

      For me, one of the most exciting aspects of Inkshares is the interconnection of the community felt and performed through the meta Inkshares website. It saddens me that this new project will miss out, in part, on one of the most innovative aspects of publishing with Inkshares--the online interconnection and social community of our growing user base. While co-authored books are certainly a minority here, I feel that as Inkshares attracts new authors, there will be more and more experiencing a similar disconnection between their co-authored works. 

      Also, I can attest to the many relationships I have made with other authors because of Inkshares, and I would be VERY surprised if we did not start to see some very exciting collaborative projects (short story anthologies and full on book authorship) created by Inkshares authors begin to pop up in the near future. I already know of one by @Richard Saunders and feel that this is an arena where an official, fully integrated co-author function on the Inkshares site would really help push the needle in funding and continuing to strengthening our community. @Richard Heinz  @John Robin @JF Dubeau @Jim McDoniel @Brian Guthrie @G. Derek Adams @Richard Saunders @Andrew J. Ainsworth @Joseph Asphahani @Paul Inman @Dave Barrett  @Zachary Tyler Linville @Craig Munro  @Joseph Terzieva @Tal Klein @Matthew Isaac Sobin @A.C. Weston @Amanda Orneck @Tom Merritt @Janna Grace  @Vincent Lim are a few who come to mind who might be interested in collaboration :)

      My suggestion and question:

      To solve this problem, I’d love to see a way where multiple accounts can be listed as an author so that there is continuity across the online system. Whether it be for co-authored books, short story anthologies, or even co-authored articles or journals, I feel it would greatly assist our community.

      What are other’s thoughts on this? Please chime in, I’d love to hear what everyone else thinks, both on the "official Inkshares team" and users (authors/readers!)

      TL;DR
      Should Inkshares have an integrated co-author function for book projects? 

      I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts. Thanks!

      Jamison Stone
      author of RUNE OF THE APPRENTICE and Inkshares fanboy

      P.S.
      Huge thanks to everyone else on the Inkshares team for making this place so special! Truly happy to be an author here, and that is because of all of your hard work and dedication! Thanks @Adam Gomolin @Angela Melamud @Matt Kaye @Avalon Marissa Radys @Elena Stofle @Larry Levitsky 
      like · liked by Alexander and 10 others

      People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, Co-Authorship on Inkshares

        Richard Saunders followed Lies and Deception
        Lies and Deception
        It begins with a murder in a Montreal Asylum. All clues point to a discrete religious organization that will stop at nothing to protect their secret plan to create "gifted" humans.Was Christ really betrayed?
        More items