Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, A question from a new user regarding content
I’ve seen a whole range of strategies, and I don’t think the amount you post correlates with how successful you are. Some people post one 2K word  excerpt, other people post 30 chapters.

I posted the first 3 episodes of my book, which are around 10K words each, during the contest I participated in. I think the majority of readers read the first episode, at the very most; I’m glad I have that much posted, but I’m also glad I didn’t spam my followers’ inboxes with 30 small chunks of writing. I also really don’t expect anyone to read all of it - but it’s there if someone wants it.

The absolute most important thing, I think, is that the first thousand words you post are very strong - as cleanly edited as you can make them, strong voice, a decent introduction into the writing style people should expect to get from your book, etc. Most people won’t read more than that, and it needs to be good. It should be enough for readers to have confidence that giving you their money will result in getting something decent in return.
like · liked by Amanda and 3 others

People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, A question from a new user regarding content

    Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say
    I’m going to do something I shouldn’t 

    Again.

    and moan

    Again.

    There is a book on here that has made over half the sales needed to be printed by inkshares, and it has me concerned. I’m concerned because it is truly awful, from the writing to the story line, even to the title. 

    I’ll never divulge who I think this is as this would only hurt someone who is trying to make their dream come true. 

    Except everyone reading this, including perhaps the author of the "truly awful" book in question, will have a theory as to whom it is. It isn’t hard to narrow this down if people are so inclined to do so. And even if those guesses are wrong, there’s a strong likelihood that someone, and maybe more than one someone, IS getting hurt from this.

    It’s actually rather unpleasant of me to be so critical, and I was reluctant to say anything. 

    It IS unpleasant, precisely because you haven’t really been critical at all and haven’t said anything at all to the person whose book you’re publicly trashing. You’re just taking a passive-aggressive potshot that helps absolutely no one. If your concern is for their feelings and not your own, why not reach out and offer some constructive criticism? Why do this instead? 

    But it did make me wonder about the value of good writing vs good marketing or simply good networking on inkshares.

    I’m concerned because I do not have the ability to market or network etc, and fear that even half decent writing, with a good story, simply will not do anywhere near as good as someone with rubbish writing, but good skills networking etc.

    I’m pretty sure I’d make 1 sale if I dared put it out there. 

    You would have made at least that many, because I would have bought a copy based on what I’d read on your project page back in January. I don’t think I’m the only one. But every time I’ve seen you on this site since then, you give off the air that you’re just here slumming it with people who are beneath you while you wait for your publisher to have a change of heart and/or competence. And I honestly wonder, for all your talent, whether you care about your own project as much as some of the "truly awful" writers care about theirs. I’d never say you don’t, because I don’t know you, but this is the impression you leave.

    Yes, marketing and networking go a long way on here. I’m lousy at both and hate doing both but I forced myself to deal with my misgivings and figure it all out because I didn’t have a choice if I wanted to make it. And I made it. You can do the same. Exceptions certainly apply, but the good work typically separates itself on here so long as that work’s author is bold enough to audibly stand behind it. But you need to embrace this method of publication and the community it’s created rather than (again, as appearances suggest) regarding it as some second class kindergarten for people who don’t deserve to be published. If you can’t do that, and if you wish to keep rapidly burning bridges instead of building them with the many, many, MANY people in this community who will gladly go to bat for good work, you should just pack up and go somewhere else. The previous pity party bellyaching was merely tiresome, but now it’s getting malicious.
    like · liked by Jamison and 14 others

    People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say

      Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say
      Bryan, i just browsed through the forum and came across this... and i truly fail to see your point, sorry to be so blunt.
      I have encountered truly awful books (well in my opinion) that were published in traditional ways that people liked.
      Sure it’s frustrating, i’m struggling for every order and yet some people with a social media base swoop in and get something funded in notime, but I don’t let jealousy get the better side of me. A man once told me "go straight and god be with you" - i try to implement this as much as i can.

      As to a book being awful. lord knows that if u take my book as a case study (god i hope u aren’t referring to me :P ) than i get feedback ranging from I love it-i’m hooked to you need an editor stat! evidently, a vast majority to the former, otherwise i would have revised myself.
      But the point is - literature is subjective, and painful as it may be - you have to learn to accept that some people like something that others find is trash. 

      like · liked by Eric and 6 others

      People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say

        Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say
        I think it’s true that networking will get you a lot further than just a good book on its own. And networking is incredibly hard. But it’s also true that there’s a fit for everyone and something you’d consider bad isn’t the same for someone else.

        Look at it this way: Inkshares is getting the foot in the door so that people will even know your book exists - how it sells after editing and publishing is what really matters. And that’s where skill will shine.
        like · liked by Eric and 4 others

        People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say

          Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say
          @Bryn Hagan Fifty Shades of Grey is the worst book I’ve ever read. But it’s also one of the most successful. Durian is a fruit that literally smells like a rotting corpse, I would rather eat dirt than subject myself to durian a second time, and yet it is regarded as "the King of Fruit" in Southeast Asia. There ain’t no accounting for taste. This is a democratic book crowdfunding platform. As @Amanda Orneck so astutely put it, if you’re looking for a curated book crowdfunding platform, check out Unbound.
          like · liked by Eric and 7 others

          People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, Something negative I'm sorry to say

            Amanda Orneck followed Suaine
            Suaine
            Queer lady writer, reader and serious geek. I’m also a professional baker/pastry chef.
            Follow
            Amanda Orneck sent an update for Deus Hex Machina

            So I got this weird sort of communique this morning from RAMSES and thought I would pass it along:

            The seventh installment is complete. Intrepid supporters may search for it now using the usual methods. More to follow as security allows. Tell no one. They are always watching.

            Creepy right?  Want to know what she’s talking about?  Make sure you preorder the book and then sign up for the email list! 
            like · liked by Peter and 5 others

            People who have liked this reader update

              Amanda Orneck followed JWR
              JWR
              Follow
              Amanda Orneck followed Cupid by Proxy
              Cupid by Proxy
              On a mission from god, a group of eccentric old men use illegal substances to spread everlasting love throughout England but their existence is under threat from a former member. Only some new members can help them in their efforts...
              Amanda Orneck liked the forum thread, How I got to 250 orders in 10 days
              I’m writing a follow-up to this, but likely won’t be done until after the contest. The short of it is that I think I’ve simplified the Inkshares marketing strategy into the four P’s:

              Perseverance: You will have good days, bad days. Treat marketing your project as you do writer’s block. 

              Positivity: Be positive. All the time. If you’re not positive, fake it. Yes, people like Morrissey have made a career out of being sad saps, but they are the minority. It’s crucial that you believe and understand that you can create luck. It’s a fact. Doubt is the enemy of luck.

              Personality: Who are you? Can I believe in you? Are you someone I’d want to hang out with? Also, when reaching out to old friends, what do they remember fondly about you? You are selling your book but you’re equally selling your own personal brand. Do people want to be associated with your brand? The answer should always be yes, but defining your brand is up to you.

              Persistence: Make a plan. Don’t make the plan too rigid, but ensure that it encapsulates how you reach your goal. You need to sell 750 books. What is your plan for getting there? Who is going to help you? Can you anticipate pratfalls? What resources are your disposal now/later?
              like · liked by Devin and 21 others

              People who have liked this comment in the forum thread, How I got to 250 orders in 10 days

                More items