"The Scientific Discovery of God" is not just a book, it is an apparent social, psychological, and scientific need for the entire race. We must answer "What is this God of whom they speak?" with a deluge of logic, reason, and deliberate abandon.

Problem: Science currently has no quantifiable and logical theory, equation, known application, or use for defining ’god’ other than the variable "x", an integer, a ’known unknown’. Endless social debate and conflict has caused a bloody and ignorant rift in the objectively obvious union between science and religion.

Solution: Construct and test a theory based on levels of known and quantifiable consciousnesses as an application for construction of artificial consciousnesses which can be useful in predictive modeling.

Potential Uses:

• Predictive models for existence of life on other planets and their locations in the known universe.
• Conceptual models explaining the movement of information through the human psyche.
• A majority classifier that can be useful for understanding non-anomalous data and how it fits into "nothing" and "infinite" based calculation scenarios.
• Better construction of artificial neural networks using human computational models.
• Better pattern recognition with regard to the ’k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm’ when a non-parametric method is needed for classification and regression in learning.
• Better solution to "never ending" Classification and Regression Trees.
• Actionable data for determining the physical location of rare matter and elements in the universe.
• Better understanding of our world and universe from social change to technological advancement.
• Advanced "game theory" outcomes.
• Common ground for an age old debate.

This is a matter of communication.

Science will not stop: it is more compassionate to teach a scientist how to realize god then it is to tell them they are wrong. Our scientists need to have God and Life defined in the language of mathematics by other scientists.

Religion will not stop: it is more important to teach a radical group how to accept science then it is to start a war with them. Our religions need to have their beliefs reconciled with physics and reality by other religious leaders.

With your Money

With the funds raised, I will pay expenses related to conducting interviews with leading physicists, spiritual leaders, mathematicians, psychologists, economists, and Athiests. I will need to offset the loss of income from my full time job, pay for travel, transcription services, and in some cases compensate those I am interviewing as well as cover peer review costs.